All These Murders And Nobody Asks The Dog
PROTECTED CONTENT
If you’re a current subscriber, log in below. If you would like to subscribe, please click the subscribe tab above.
Username and Password Help
Please enter your email and we will send you a password reset link.
Sweetie — Chief Security Officer
And Mystery Analyst
I have expanded my surveillance routine beyond my yard and Dupuy Street to international horizons. My human calls it watching British mysteries. I call it scenery with a body count.
At first glance, these villages appear harmless. There are stone cottages with climbing roses. Narrow lanes. Church bells ringing politely across tidy greens. Women cycling with flowers in baskets. Men in sensible tweed who appear to have strong opinions about marmalade.
And then someone is discovered behind the tea shop.
I have been tracking the pattern.
The more charming the village, the more astronomical the murder rate. If there are hanging flower baskets on every lamppost, heighten alert status immediately. If there is a bakery known for its Victoria sponge, someone will not live to taste it. If the town hosts an annual fête on the grounds of a stately home, a regatta along the river, a craft fair beneath striped tents, or a competitive jam festival, cancel it and go home.
What troubles me most is the abundance of dogs.
They are everywhere.
Spaniels. Labradors. Terriers with excellent instincts and expressive eyebrows. They accompany villagers on brisk walks. They lie faithfully beneath pub tables. They clearly register when something is amiss.
And yet when suspicious activity occurs, does anyone turn to the dog and say, “Well? What do you think?”
They do not.
The dog stiffens. The dog growls. The dog quite obviously identifies the problematic neighbor.
And the human says, “I wonder what’s wrong with Poppy?”
This explains the crime rate.
I have also observed that British law enforcement is routinely outmaneuvered by civilians who treat crime as a hobby.
If you encounter an elderly lady perpetually holding knitting needles, understand that she has already solved the case and is merely allowing the police to catch up.
If you see a priest whose flock seems suspiciously inclined toward criminal behavior, do not be distracted by his gentle manner. That man knows everything. He has had tea with the murderer twice.
If you run across two world-class gardeners, with an alarming knowledge of soil conditions, restoring a beautiful English garden, the investigation is essentially over. They will discuss root systems while quietly identifying the killer. The police are now ornamental.
Meanwhile, the detectives pace. They frown thoughtfully. They drink an alarming amount of tea. They reconstruct timelines in great detail.
Back on my sofa, I identified the guilty party within the first six minutes. My left ear did most of the work.
While fictional crimes unfold across cobblestone lanes, I maintain full operational readiness here at home. I position myself where I can see both the television and the neighborhood. I catalog squirrel movement. If anyone approaches our yard with ill intent and a casserole, I will know.
My human believes she is relaxing.
I am working.
At the end of each episode, order is restored. The culprit confesses. The elderly lady resumes knitting. The priest returns to his curiously eventful parish. The gardeners resume pruning as if nothing at all has happened.
The church bells ring again. The flower baskets sway. The homicide rate resets for the following week.
My human reaches down and scratches between my ears.
I allow her to feel safe.
But I have drawn one firm conclusion from my research.
If we ever travel to a village with hanging baskets, a competitive baking society, an unattended teapot and more than three charming residents with suspiciously well-developed hobbies, I will remain in the car with the engine running.
And I will absolutely insist they consult the dog.
