Skip to content

Guard Deployments Strain Budgets And Communities

Dear Editor,

It seems like there is concern about the idea of sending Mississippi’s National Guard units to other cities or states—like Washington, D.C.—when those areas have not formally requested assistance. This article aims to explore the financial and social implications of such a move, without diving into political affiliations or naming specific figures.

First, let’s talk about the cost. Deploying troops out of state can be quite expensive. Each day a single troop is stationed away from home adds up in terms of transportation, housing, and operational costs. If we were to estimate a per-person, per-day expense, it might run into several hundred dollars per troop. For a deployment of a few hundred troops over several days, those costs multiply quickly when you consider it costs approximately $530 per day per National Guard member. With approximately 2,000 National Guard in Washington, it is costing taxpayers around a million dollars a day.

Now, consider what that money represents. At a time when our national debt is already a significant concern, any additional expenditure is worth scrutinizing. The funds used to deploy troops could arguably be directed toward reducing our national debt or invested back into local infrastructure and services that might have a more direct benefit for Mississippians themselves.

There’s also a social dimension to think about. Troops are primarily trained for defense and military operations, not for law enforcement or local policing. Deploying them into communities that haven’t asked for their presence can be seen as an imposition and might create tension. Certain segments of the population could view it as an infringement on their local authority and responsibilities, leading to a perception of federal overreach or even an “invasion” of their community space.

While the intention behind sending troops might be security or assistance, it’s essential to weigh the financial costs and the broader impacts. Redirecting those funds toward debt reduction or local needs might offer more tangible benefits, and ensuring that local authorities are the ones to request help can foster better community relations and trust.
Sincerely,
Dr. Andy Myrick
Water Valley

Leave a Comment